Il collega Andrea Pitasi invia questa comunicazione. ATTENZIONE, chi fosse interessato è pregato di scrivere direttamente al collega (pitasigda@gmail.com) e non al presente indirizzo
Carissime/I, vi segnalo , per chi fosse interessato, questo PRIN in progress. È piuttosto strutturato e già in via di stesura abbastanza avanzata ma un ‘unità locale in più non guasterebbe. Termine ultimo per segnalarmi la vostra eventuale adesione: domenica 17 Maggio pv. Cari saluti. Andrea Pitasi,
Global Governance and Policy Modelling in the WHO’s ONE HEALTH Programme: the case of interspecies relationships in search for a sustainable evolutionary balance **** The project is interdisciplinary, spanning medicine,, phisiologyv sociology, law, philosophy, architecture, and more. Sociologically, it focuses on a matrice of levels L and dimensions D
L1. ONE HEALTH as a program of global governance and policy modeling , which would represent the most abstract level, beneath which lies L2. global governance of interspecies health with legal, political, economic, ethical, and technological implications, even further below level L3 of the speciesism/antispeciesism debate; finally, L4, the level of case studies, which can vary from unit to unit. These levels constitute a deductive framework without any other kind of hierarchy. The project would cut across five policy dimensions: D1 the human species in itself as the most “artificial” species; D2 the human species in relation to those species increasingly under artificial human management, complete with all-encompassing human behavioral deviations such as in the genetic mistreatment of dogs; D3 the human species in mutual domestication within the framework of interspecies ecological civilization (the cat culture in Istanbul at(For example, the culture of cats in Istanbul, where behavioral nudges and social communication become strategic for shaping the framework) D4 the human species in the wild, where every species is a potential predator or prey in relationships of strength and weakness—not to be confused with presumed superiority or inferiority of species—because, as Einstein taught us, one cannot judge the intelligence and abilities of a fish by how well it climbs a tree. D5 the oikos itself with mountains, deserts, oceans, etc.
It is easy to envision a unit specialized in the interspecies dynamics between humans and marine species in a maritime/oceanic environment or in an artificial aquaculture setting. As one might guess, D1 and D2 are the most artificial, D4 the most natural, and D5 represents hybridization, where scenarios ranging from the most super-artificial to the wildest coexist on our little planet; D3 would apparently be the most harmonious, balanced, and sustainable scenario, but this requires further study. So, how can we make ONE HEALTH increasingly a pattern of evolutionary, sustainable, and dynamic interspecies balance? The project would thus make an interdisciplinary contribution to the development and enhancement of ONE HEALTH